TY - JOUR
T1 - An eyecare foundation model for clinical assistance
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - EyeFM Global Reader Study Team
AU - Wu, Yilan
AU - Qian, Bo
AU - Li, Tingyao
AU - Qin, Yiming
AU - Guan, Zhouyu
AU - Chen, Tingli
AU - Jia, Yali
AU - Zhang, Ping
AU - Zeng, Dian
AU - Moroi, Sayoko
AU - Raman, Rajiv
AU - Thinggaard, Benjamin Sommer
AU - Pedersen, Frederik
AU - Ñehe, José Alogo Obiang
AU - Kamalden, Tengku Ain
AU - Zhou, Yukun
AU - Jin, Yixiao
AU - Li, Huating
AU - Ran, An Ran
AU - Yang, Dawei
AU - Meng, Ziyao
AU - Peng, Qingsheng
AU - Zheng, Ying Feng
AU - Wang, Dingqiao
AU - Ji, Hongwei
AU - Zang, Pengxiao
AU - Yin, Changchang
AU - Shen, Jie
AU - Chen, Youxin
AU - Yu, Weihong
AU - Dai, Rongping
AU - Zhang, Chenxi
AU - Zhao, Xinyu
AU - Wang, Xiangning
AU - Chen, Yan
AU - Wu, Qiang
AU - Xie, Hongbin
AU - Szeto, Simon K.H.
AU - Chan, Julia Y.Y.
AU - Chan, Victor T.T.
AU - Xie, Hua Tao
AU - Wei, Ruili
AU - Li, Jin
AU - Ma, Weizhi
AU - Zhu, Lei
AU - Wang, Hongqiu
AU - Fu, Huazhu
AU - Mendel, Thomas A.
AU - Adeli, Mona
AU - Evans, Joshua
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2025.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - In the context of an increasing need for clinical assessments of foundation models, we developed EyeFM, a multimodal vision–language eyecare copilot, and conducted a multifaceted evaluation, including retrospective validations, multicountry efficacy validation as a clinical copilot and a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT). EyeFM was pretrained on 14.5 million ocular images from five imaging modalities paired with clinical texts from global, multiethnic datasets. Efficacy validation invited 44 ophthalmologists across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa in primary and specialty care settings, highlighting its utility as a clinical copilot. The RCT—a parallel, single-center, double-masked study—assessed EyeFM as a clinical copilot in retinal disease screening among a high-risk population in China. A total of 668 participants (mean age 57.5 years, 79.5% male) were randomized to 16 ophthalmologists, equally allocated into intervention (with EyeFM copilot) and control (standard care) groups. The primary endpoint indicated that ophthalmologists with EyeFM copilot achieved higher correct diagnostic rate (92.2% versus 75.4%, P < 0.001) and referral rate (92.2% versus 80.5%, P < 0.001). Secondary outcome indicated improved standardization score of clinical reports (median 33 versus 37, P < 0.001). Participant satisfaction with the screening was similar between groups, whereas the intervention group demonstrated higher compliance with self-management (70.1% versus 49.1%, P < 0.001) and referral suggestions (33.7% versus 20.2%, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Post-deployment evaluations indicated strong user acceptance. Our study provided evidence that implementing EyeFM copilot can improve the performance of ophthalmologists and the outcome of patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2500095518.
AB - In the context of an increasing need for clinical assessments of foundation models, we developed EyeFM, a multimodal vision–language eyecare copilot, and conducted a multifaceted evaluation, including retrospective validations, multicountry efficacy validation as a clinical copilot and a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT). EyeFM was pretrained on 14.5 million ocular images from five imaging modalities paired with clinical texts from global, multiethnic datasets. Efficacy validation invited 44 ophthalmologists across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa in primary and specialty care settings, highlighting its utility as a clinical copilot. The RCT—a parallel, single-center, double-masked study—assessed EyeFM as a clinical copilot in retinal disease screening among a high-risk population in China. A total of 668 participants (mean age 57.5 years, 79.5% male) were randomized to 16 ophthalmologists, equally allocated into intervention (with EyeFM copilot) and control (standard care) groups. The primary endpoint indicated that ophthalmologists with EyeFM copilot achieved higher correct diagnostic rate (92.2% versus 75.4%, P < 0.001) and referral rate (92.2% versus 80.5%, P < 0.001). Secondary outcome indicated improved standardization score of clinical reports (median 33 versus 37, P < 0.001). Participant satisfaction with the screening was similar between groups, whereas the intervention group demonstrated higher compliance with self-management (70.1% versus 49.1%, P < 0.001) and referral suggestions (33.7% versus 20.2%, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Post-deployment evaluations indicated strong user acceptance. Our study provided evidence that implementing EyeFM copilot can improve the performance of ophthalmologists and the outcome of patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2500095518.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016613680
U2 - 10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7
DO - 10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 40877476
AN - SCOPUS:105016613680
SN - 1078-8956
VL - 31
SP - 3404
EP - 3413
JO - Nature Medicine
JF - Nature Medicine
IS - 10
ER -