Bridging the design and modeling of causal inference: A Bayesian nonparametric perspective

Xinyi Xu, Steven N. Maceachern, Bo Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In their seminal paper first published 40 years ago, Rosenbaum and Rubin crafted the concept of the propensity score to tackle the challenging problem of causal inference in observational studies. The propensity score is set up mostly as a design tool to recreate a randomization like scenario, through matching or subclassification. Bayesian development over the past two decades has adopted a modeling framework to infer the causal effect. In this commentary, we highlight the connection between the design-and model-based perspectives to analysis. We briefly review a Bayesian nonparametric framework that utilizes Gaussian Process models on propensity scores to mimic matched designs. We also discuss the role of variation as well as bias in estimators arising from observational data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalObservational Studies
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Gaussian Process
  • Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
  • Prognostic Score
  • Propensity Score

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the design and modeling of causal inference: A Bayesian nonparametric perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this