Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cleavage of Bacteriophage λ cI Repressor Involves the RecA C-Terminal Domain

  • Vitold E. Galkin
  • , Xiong Yu
  • , Jakub Bielnicki
  • , Dieudonné Ndjonka
  • , Charles E. Bell
  • , Edward H. Egelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The SOS response to DNA damage in Escherichia coli involves at least 43 genes, all under the control of the LexA repressor. Activation of these genes occurs when the LexA repressor cleaves itself, a reaction catalyzed by an active, extended RecA filament formed on DNA. It has been shown that the LexA repressor binds within the deep groove of this nucleoprotein filament, and presumably, cleavage occurs in this groove. Bacteriophages, such as λ, have repressors (cI) that are structural homologs of LexA and also undergo self-cleavage when SOS is induced. It has been puzzling that some mutations in RecA that affect the cleavage of repressors are in the C-terminal domain (CTD) far from the groove where cleavage is thought to occur. In addition, it has been shown that the rate of cleavage of cI by RecA is dependent upon both the substrate on which RecA is polymerized and the ATP analog used. Electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions show that the conformation and dynamics of RecA's CTD are also modulated by the polynucleotide substrate and ATP analog. Under conditions where the repressor cleavage rates are the highest, cI is coordinated within the groove by contacts with RecA's CTD. These observations provide a framework for understanding previous genetic and biochemical observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-787
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Volume385
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 23 2009

Keywords

  • electron microscopy
  • helical polymers
  • image processing
  • recombination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cleavage of Bacteriophage λ cI Repressor Involves the RecA C-Terminal Domain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this