Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of practice change on outcomes of extremely preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus

  • B. Ezenwa
  • , E. Pena
  • , A. Schlegel
  • , R. Bapat
  • , E. G. Shepherd
  • , L. D. Nelin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether a decrease in patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment or ligation in extremely preterm (EP) infants was associated with changes in rates of mortality and/or morbidities. Methods: Observational study on EP infants admitted from 2008 to 2015. The small baby guidelines do not mandate ligation, however, in late 2010 the guidelines were amended based on new literature suggested that ligation may increase rates of morbidities. Results: There were 717 EP infants admitted during the study period. There were no significant changes in gestational age, birthweight or annual admissions during the study period. The annual rate of PDA medical treatment declined significantly (R = 0.83, p = 0.01), while the annual rate of PDA ligation declined substantially (R = 0.88, p = 0.004). The annual mortality rate also declined significantly (R = 0.81, p = 0.014). The annual rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotising enterocolitis and intraventricular haemorrhage did not change significantly. Conclusion: In this cohort of EP patients, the rate of PDA ligation decreased substantially since 2010, with no apparent adverse effects on mortality or rates of BPD. These data are consistent with the concept that ligation does not improve outcomes in EP infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-93
Number of pages6
JournalActa Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
Volume108
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  • Extremely preterm infant
  • Neurodevelopmental outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of practice change on outcomes of extremely preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this