Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Imaging of pleural masses: Which to choose?-Republished article

  • Aaron S. Bruns
  • , John G. Mastronarde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of pleural masses is limited. Asbestos-related disease and invasive bronchogenic carcinoma make up the majority of cases. The diagnostic yield of biopsies is low, and invasive procedures are often required to achieve diagnosis. A variety of imaging techniques are available to help differentiate between benign and malignant disease to help discern which patients to biopsy. While computed tomography has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) both appear to have higher accuracy. MRI has the added benefit of being an excellent aid in determining surgical resectability of tumors. MRI and PET are limited, however, by their cost and availability in certain regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-14
Number of pages5
JournalRespiratory Medicine CME
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Non-small cell lung carcinoma
  • Pleural neoplasms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging of pleural masses: Which to choose?-Republished article'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this